FSLR Downgrade; Falls; Is Still Overvalued «


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
  • Lower Trade Costs Nobody likes paying more than they have to. Now, through the use of contracts for difference trading, you can trade globally without the cumbersome monetary outlay required with traditional share buying.
  • Meta:

    FSLR Downgrade; Falls; Is Still Overvalued

    June 5th, 2009 by CA Editors


    Stephen Frankola sends: Barrons wrote about First Solar’s (FSLR) weaknesses and competitive threats this weekend (Reuters coverage of Barron’s commentary here), and an analyst, FBR Capital Markets, followed up Barron’s with a downgrade last Tuesday morning.

    The FBR analyst, who slapped an “underperform” rating on FSLR, mused that “recent checks indicate at least one of First Solar’s top customers has already switched from First Solar to a silicon-based module vendor for a project that is currently under construction.”

    The Yahoo! article covering the analyst downgrade elaborated:

    “Hosseini noted that FBR’s meeting with the KfW Bank Group, a Frankfurt-based development bank that lends especially to economic, social and ecological projects internationally, revealed that its year-to-date photovoltaic project backlog has shifted dramatically toward silicon-based modules compared with its 2008 thin-film-focused mix.”

    I have previously drawn similar conclusions on this blog and on Student Stocks. First Solar is a company that is ALREADY overvalued even before considering the significant, growing competition that they face from both silicon-panel makers and thin-film outfits. Though the share price unfortunately increased after my last article, I made (real) money in the past shorting FSLR from $280 to $140. Though shares have fallen $20 (10%) since the Barrons and FBR pieces, shares still should have plenty of downside room. I tried to short FSLR a few weeks ago (shares were at levels similar to today’s price) but none were available.

    I continue to dislike FSLR shares at this price, in this environment. I’d never go long, and I will be considering initiating a short position.

    Subscribe to our feed using your favorite service:

    AddThis Feed Button

    Originally published by Stephen on TheNoBuyList, a blog focused on negative analysis of companies.

    More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on First Solar at Wikinvest

    See more Energy, FSLR, Short Stocks, Solar, Stephen Frankola |

    6 Responses

    1. jch Says:

      If yo uknew it all you would not be talking not thinkink it might, but doing it.

    2. Douchedestroyer Says:

      Short FSLR and see what happens.

    3. Mr. Moe Says:

      This site is hilarious - I thought it was satire at first, a cruel hedge fund manager’s way of making his worst performing minions learn basic trading lessons. You are using your short FSLR position as a reference point when everybody in the market thought the apocalypse was about to happen and people were buying guns hand over fist? Now that we are rebounding with commodities and energy rising, do you not notice that the solar stocks are moving alongside it? Thanks for the unintentional comedy kiddies.

    4. powerguy Says:

      Anyone citing FBR is dangerous indeed. Watch your step or you might step in it.

    5. Dave Says:

      FSLR will be at $200 again before Mid July at the latest. My prediction. The switchover contract is easily balanced by the news releases of new contracts. Hold tight FSLR investors. I am long on FSLR (bought at $123).

    6. Stephen Says:

      Mr. Moe

      Your observation that solar stocks perform similarly to traditional energy stocks is profound.

      In the short term, the two will move in tandem. But the solar industry is becoming crowded and FSLR’s technologies aren’t the silicon-killers they once were.

      I’m not short, but I wouldn’t go long.

    Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.