Two Pairs Trades Capitalize on Distress
James Cullen
This is going to have to be a short post, because I’m very time constrained at the moment. Hopefully that changes over the weekend.
Right now, there are unprecedented levels of stress in pretty much every tradable market. It’s difficult to navigate a market with such information asymmetry, not to mention tiresome to look at your portfolio (seemingly) every day and see things down. But for those of you with cash on the sidelines, the number of distressed sellers out there is presenting opportunities for smart pairs trading, which is fantastic at a time like this because the long/short nature of it provides for a natural market hedge.
One truism that I believe was overlooked too much in recent years – and I’m pretty sure we’re almost all guilty of this – is that you should only look to be buying from distressed/irrational sellers. Markets aren’t efficient all the time, but they do a pretty good job on average, and thus odds are you don’t have that much of an advantage over whoever you’re buying from. At times like this, however, the investor with liquidity (and it tends to be the intelligent ones who sat on their hands as things were going smoothly) has an enormous advantage on an overextended trader who needs to raise cash.
To personalize this and give you a profit opportunity, last week (Sept. 29) the Boston College Investment Club was voting on whether or not to sell Hugoton Royalty Trust (HGT), a spinoff of XTO Energy (XTO). Hugoton holds several natural gas-producing properties in the Midwest and Western US, and simply distributes the royalty income – which is a percentage of the profits derived from the sale of natural gas extracted from their lands – tax-free. Roughly 90% of the distributions and remaining reserves come from natural gas, and the monthly dividend reflects the short-term price of natural gas. Because these kinds of stocks (technically units) are somewhat obscure, there’s a lot of misunderstanding about them, especially when the dividend gets annualized and the stock price subsequently gets crushed… like now, as Hugoton is showing a yield in excess of 24%. But that’s beside the point; consider how HGT is priced relative to the price of the natural gas (ETF: UNG) from which the distributions are set:

I wanted to sell HGT, but the majority vote needed to do so wasn’t there, so BCIC still owns a small position in HGT. This chart, however, makes me think I’ll continue to wish we had gotten rid of the units, at least in relation to its underlying commodity… and that there is a profit opportunity for traders looking to short HGT and own UNG, and ride the trade back down to its historical range.
As a second possibility, I offer the much more deterministic bet on Mueller Water (MWA, MWA-B), which has two classes of stock with equal economic interests but with differing voting rights – the B shares have 8 votes, to the A shares’ 1 vote – yet the B shares trade at nearly a 20% discount. Lest this be misconstrued as my own brilliance, I just read it from Sham Gad a few days back.

Subscribe to our feed using your favorite service:
![]()
See more Energy, HGT, James Cullen, MWA, Oil and Gas, Pairs Trades, UNG, XTO |

October 9th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
I hope you will post on Primus soon.
October 9th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
I realize it’s been a while… that’s a post that’s always under construction, it seems. Very soon.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
James, admittedly everyone’s investment decision is their own responsibility, but I am trying to decide if I should take a 60% loss on the common tommorrow, assuming it opens near the close (no sure thing), and I would love to hear from you since I got interested in the stock from your report. How massive a problem is the icelandic bank CDS issue?
October 9th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
In regards to PRS,I think the problem would be a possible liquidity issue. They reported 250 million in cash and cash equivalents in the last annual report, and according to my running tally they have ~170 million in payouts coming up.
I would be careful of MWA/MWA.b I’ve owned MWA.b since it was spun off from WLT. I wanted to sell then, but stupidly thought I would wait for the gap to close. It never has. Its been at least a year maybe two. I’ve since lost over 50% because I wanted that last 10% in the spread with A. Its a great example of market inefficiency. One could have lost alot of money in the last two years keeping the trade open, and then having the spread Triple! It should be possible for such a thing to persist, much less grow, but it did. I believe it is because their far fewer A share available, and the lazy investor will by the A series without even knowing the B exists. If they do its easy to assume as is better then B.
October 9th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
John,
I’m holding on to my Primus. I got a research note the other day that showed the flexibility Primus has in terms of capital management, one scenario outlined took place today, and even though the market (re)action today was terrible - I’m not giving up yet… now, this could be because the majority of my Primus is the debt, but I still own some common and plan on keeping it that way.
Travis,
Liquidity shouldn’t be the issue - it would be insufficient capital. In the last Q, they had $300M in cash, but another $600M in investments… almost all of which are US agency obligations.
Re: MWA, I’m not looking for a perfect 1:1 convergence, and having the short hedge on reduces risk. Agreed, though, on the absurd persistence of the gap.
October 13th, 2008 at 11:43 am
[...] round out this Festival by offering Two Pairs Trades to Capitalize on Distress posted at College Analysts by James [...]