AddThis Social Bookmark Button
  • Lower Trade Costs Nobody likes paying more than they have to. Now, through the use of contracts for difference trading, you can trade globally without the cumbersome monetary outlay required with traditional share buying.
  • Meta:

    Cal-Maine (CALM) Longs Walking on Eggshells

    April 15th, 2008 by James Cullen

    At the most recent meeting of the Boston College Investment Club, we had three stock pitches - a sell pitch for Wachovia (WB), a buy pitch for Astra-Zeneca (AZN), and a buy pitch for Cal-Maine (CALM). Because Cal-Maine is by far the most underfollowed of these, I found it most interesting that someone would find (and then present) this idea. While the numbers on Cal-Maine make it look attractive, I believe there are a number of red flags that make me exceptionally wary to agreeing to a purchase.

    Cal-Maine is the largest domestic producer of eggs, as well as the only publicly traded egg producing company. After a huge run-up of late, the company has a market valuation of just over $700 million. Cal-Maine had a huge first quarter this year, and turned more in profit than it did all of last year combined. This gives the stock a very low P/E (about 5x and change), and profitability ratios (i.e. return on equity) that look extremely attractive. Betting on CALM here is betting that things really are different this time, because the absolute worst time to buy a cyclical stock is when the earnings multiples are lowest. Maybe we are in the middle of a great supply/demand situation for egg farmers that will hold into the future, Cal-Maine will continue to be highly profitable, the stock runs 20 points and I look stupid. Maybe, however, this is a case of the longs in a stock getting confused about why things look so good (see: the tech darlings of 2007) - because Cal-Maine is not part of the secular agriculture boom. If anything, they’re hurt through it via higher feed prices, and I’m confident feed prices will stay high as long as our government continues the subsidizing of corn, wheat, soybeans, etc., through the burn your food, fuel your car program known as ethanol - a program so insanely contrived, it is literally responsible for death and political unrest all around the world. But I digress…

    I believe the presentation unfairly glossed over this fact, as there was a lack of adjustment for seasonal factors, leaving the implied annual earnings and dividend yield far too high. It’s the equivalent of pretending every quarter for a retailer is like the last six weeks of the calendar year… ok, perhaps a bad analogy in light of how terrible retail sales have been, but hopefully you catch my point. But to make it concrete: gross margins in Q1 2008 were 37%; in Q2 2007 gross margins were 24% - obviously making for some wild intra-year swings.

    Another point made by the two presenters was that CALM has a very low correlation to the BCIC portfolio as a whole, so while it might be a risky or volatile stock in itself, adding it to our portfolio will add diversification benefits. Specifically, it was pointed out that our exposure to consumer nondurables was low after our sale of Village Supermarkets (VLGEA) - a sell pitch that I was responsible for. This would be a chance to essentially practice “moat arbitrage” and eschew a company like Cal-Maine that has a very narrow moat at best in favor of an established food producer that can command a premium for its products - examples include Campbell Soup (CPB), General Mills (GIS), Kellogg (K), and Kraft (KFT). While none of those companies offer the hypothetical upside a Cal-Maine does in a scenario where, say, egg prices soar to new highs, they also won’t get crushed like Cal-Maine will when this commodity business rolls over the cycle.

    There, I said it. Cal-Maine is a commodity business - albeit the biggest player in it, which offers some scale advantages, but not enough to make it anything special. More problematic, supply in the egg industry is constrained only by how many chickens can be hatched and how many cages can be built. While the latter point has worked in favor of the egg industry of late, it is assured that more capacity can be brought online - unlike in a hard asset commodity business like oil, copper, etc., where there is a finite amount of the stuff in the ground… but I digress. Sticking to agricultural commodities, I think eggs are even less favorable than grains, because land used for grain planting has been in decline for a prolonged period of time, and there is a relatively low ceiling on the amount of production that can be taken from any planting area in a finite time. Eggs, on the other hand, can be produced by stacking dozens of cages on top of each other and having each chicken produce a couple hundred eggs per year. What does the evidence point to in terms of industry supply trends? Yes, supply has been constrained - but it looks to be gradually expanding, as pullet chicks hatched is at a multi-year high, as is eggs under incubation - in other words, farmers are breeding more chickens to capitalize on the high prices. As invariably happens in a commodity business, this will cannibalize margins and profits.

    Along the lines of cannibalizing profits, while Cal-Maine will realize cyclical prices for its eggs (again, egg prices have fallen 25% since Easter and will fall further), they are going to be hit by much, much higher prices for feed - somewhere in the neighborhood of 50% higher than the same time last year is possible, judging from industry data. And this is where I believe people have it wrong about this stock: Cal-Maine has traded like it is part of the secular agriculture boom, when its main source of revenues is probably a 1-2% growth business. On the flip side, its cost inputs will be affected by the secular move up in the inputs that go into feed - namely corn and soybeans. This is why I’m betting…

    Shorts have been all over this stock. CALM has an enormous short position that has continually been ratcheted up even as the stock rose. More than 75% of the float is short. Now read that again. We all know what a short squeeze is, and so do the hedge funds that are behind this short position. When the shorts are willing to place this large of a bet against a stock, that alone should tell you something. But when that underlying stock is an extremely cyclical business with profits at a high and a stock price that follows… I have to believe that the shorts are right here, and Cal-Maine’s profitability (and stock) is going to get hit.

    Subscribe to our feed:

    AddThis Feed Button

    See the Powerpoint on CALM.

    More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Cal-Maine Foods at Wikinvest

    See more AZN, CALM, Food and Restaurants, James Cullen, Short Stocks, Small Caps, WB |

    19 Responses

    1. MSG Says:

      Hmmm… looks interesting.

      Anyone want to do a follow up on Crox? Looks like they got hammered today. Looks like this fad is out the door.

    2. James Cullen Says:

      MSG,
      I saw CROX get cut in half… again. Not surprised - seems management gave a complete BS reason for the inventory build last quarter as everyone suspected then; worst fears are materializing, and the stock is getting killed.

      Good. They made ugly shoes anyways.

    3. someone Says:

      You forgot one fundamental fact:

      Calm has their own farm to frow feed.

    4. Jonathan Pliszka- DePaul University Says:

      I’ve watched this stock for about 6 months. With more and more reports coming out regarding the long lasting food increases, I’ve got no reason not to remain bullish on this stock.

      This might be of interest:
      http://www.uniteconomics.com/files/Cal-Maine_Foods_Inc.pdf

      - Jonathan

    5. James Cullen Says:

      Someone,
      I didn’t forget that, I just don’t see the relevance. If feed costs remain high relative to shell egg prices, CALM’s profitability will be hurt.

      As the company says itself, “Although feed ingredients are available from a number of sources, we have little, if any, control over the prices of the ingredients that we purchase, which are affected by various demand and supply factors and have experienced significant fluctuations in the past.” [Last 10-K]

      Add that to “Feed cost per dozen of shell eggs produced for the thirteen-weeks ended March 1, 2008 was $.347 per dozen, as compared to the thirteen-week period ended March 3, 2007 feed cost per dozen of $.278, an increase of 24.9%; this was due to higher costs paid for corn and soybean meal our primary feed ingredients. Most industry projections indicate that costs for corn and soybean meal will continue to be at elevated levels due to demands for usage in ethanol and biodiesel production, and continued competition for acreage from other grain producers.” [Last 10-Q]

    6. MSG Says:

      By the way, here is my follow up to an earlier thread on tech valuations and Apple. Let me just re-iterate: tech is competitive!

      http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/15/study-google-lost-share-of-search-ad-dollars-to-yahoo/

      Google will be the next Cisco.

    7. Jonathan Pliszka- DePaul University Says:

      Egg prices need to rise 21% to offset feed cost inflation, they are currently up 34% YOY.

    8. James Cullen Says:

      Jonathan,
      When/where are you getting your egg price information from?

    9. Jonathan Pliszka- DePaul University Says:

      The research report (dated 3/24/08) that I attached. While I’m unfamiliar with the firm, they include a contact. Perhaps if you’re very interested you could contact the analyst directly.

      - Jonathan

    10. James Cullen Says:

      Ah, ok. The numbers you quoted sounded familiar.

      Realize that prices quoted in that report come from a time of ideal (peak) conditions for the industry. Egg prices are back in the $1.20s, hence flirting with the 21% cost increase needed to offset feed cost inflation. Moreover, egg prices are going to fall further in the coming months, while feed costs will not by any substantial margin, if at all.

    11. Jonathan Pliszka- DePaul University Says:

      http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/retail/article/lofty-egg-prices-showing-sign-cracking-soon_538997_7.html

      This article is about two weeks old. When did egg prices fall? Do you have any articles? I don’t buy eggs, so I wouldn’t know.

    12. palffy Says:

      James, I think another thing of note that you might have missed in your analysis is that this stock has always been highly-shorted, with a short float above 50% all the time since as far back as 2003. So although short-term shorters have had instances of profitability, as this is in fact a volatile stock, in the long term, this has been a pretty unprofitable stock to short..

      This stock is probably long term bullish (at least until egg production increases, which everyone is betting against to avoid a similar 2004 crash), so considering it’s quite undersold at the moment would give me a buy signal as well in a few days once volume stabilizes..

    13. James Cullen Says:

      Jonathan,
      “The price for a dozen eggs Thursday was $1.25, down 25.1% from its “Easter high” of $1.67.”

      http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/10/calmaine-dividend-update-markets-equity-cx_mlm_0410markets30.html?partner=yahootix

      That is from April 10th.

    14. James Cullen Says:

      Palffy,
      I don’t think you’re correct about the short situation. According to data from Nasdaq, short interest was about 550K shares at this point last year, when the stock was in the low teens. Since then, short interest has swelled 23-fold to almost 13M shares… so unless my numbers are bad, short interest was about 3.5% at this point last year.

      Please correct me if I am off.

    15. palffy Says:

      Actually, I take it back and you are correct.. it looks like the shorts tampered off to ~2-4% after the dip in 2005

    16. Bert Says:

      One point that people seem to be missing from the annual report is that Cal-Maine states that margins have generally risen with feed prices. Yes, you read that correctly and can find that in the report. Cal-Maine has historically been more profitable with higher feed prices.

    17. James Cullen Says:

      Bert,
      You’re correct in that it they do say that… so the big question - are higher feed prices now structurally similar to previous times?

      That might have to be the subject of a future post.

    18. April 28, 2008 Edition of the Festival of Stocks | Investing Adventures Says:

      [...] Cullen presents Cal-Maine (CALM) Longs Walking on Eggshells posted at College [...]

    19. Festival of Stocks at Investing Adventures - Fat Pitch Financials Says:

      [...] of Stocks is up at Investing Adventures. Be sure to check out James Cullen’s article on Cal-Maine (CALM). His warning on this stock is worth [...]

    Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.