AddThis Social Bookmark Button
  • Lower Trade Costs Nobody likes paying more than they have to. Now, through the use of contracts for difference trading, you can trade globally without the cumbersome monetary outlay required with traditional share buying.
  • Meta:

    Wall Street Values Bear Stearns (BSC) at $90/share

    March 18th, 2008 by CA Editors



    Stephen Frankola sends: Wait… hold on a second… Didn’t Bear Stearns (BSC) close at less than $5/share today, because of the pending buyout at $2/share?!?

    Well, it’s true that Bear’s market cap at the end of today was $650 million, a horrifyingly low number based on its value of more than $20 billion less than one year ago.

    But here’s another way to measure the value of Bear Stearns; JPMorgan’s (JPM) price increase.

    JPM shares were up $3.77 yesterday, as the company announced that it was planning to acquire BSC at $2/share. Clearly, investors think that JPM is getting a great deal, as it was one of the only financials to rally on a day when the XLF (the S&P Financial Sector ETF) fell 2%.

    So, about that $90/share valuation…

    JPMorgan was up $3.77, and there are 3.4 billion outstanding shares. Therefore, JPM’s market cap increased $12.8 billion today. If you divide that $12.8 billion by Bear’s 136 million outstanding shares, the value of JPM’s increase translated into Bear shares would price BSC at $94/share.

    Now, I don’t think that BSC is worth $90 per share; there are clearly issues that BSC needs to resolve. However, it does show that investors, whether they are right or wrong, value Bear at much, much more than $2 share.

    So what does this mean?

    I certainly don’t think that the deal will close at $2 share. Today, Bear shares were changing hands at more than twice that much, implying that another party would make a higher offer or that JPM needed to raise its price. The offer does have to be approved by Bear’s shareholders, and I think that the 1/3 of shares owned by company employees will lead the vote against the current buyout offer. The Fed did guarantee Bear funding for 28 days, and JPM’s new backing of obligations will last a year, as the deal is pending, so Bear’s shareholders have some time to think about what to do.

    Now, as confidence is restored, the discount window is open, and JPM is insuring obligations, Bear might not need to sell itself at all. As I disclosed before, I own a tiny stake in Bear, and I won’t be adding to it at these prices; the uncertainty just isn’t worth risking more money. I paid $30 for my shares - thankfully not $50 or $100 or $150 - and I may never see that $30 price again.

    Just as many negative factors came together over Long Island, forming the perfect financial storm that capsized Bear’s stock, clearing skies, and promise of cheap, available, and guaranteed money may just prove to be a lifeboat for Bear shareholders. Whether it means a buyout at $10, $20, $30, or $50, or the continuation of Bear operating independently, this display of valuation by JPM’s investors shows that Bear is worth a lot more than $2/share.

    Subscribe to our feed:

    AddThis Feed Button

    Visit Stephen’s Blog.

    Read more about financial stocks.

    See more BSC, Financials, JPM, Stephen Frankola, XLF |

    4 Responses

    1. B Roberts Says:

      There are a few issues that you have not included in your analysis. First, as part of the deal JPM now has an option to buy Bear’s office building even if the deal with Bear does not go through. Second, there are very few financial players out there with the balance sheet strong enough to take down Bear and all its liabilities (financial and legal), and still be able to provide liquidity. The only reason that Bear “opened” for business on Monday was that the fed was providing 30 billion of liquidity as a back stop. No other financial institution had the balance sheet or the blessing of the Fed, otherwise there would have been a bidding war.

      The idea that “as confidence is restored, the discount window is open, and JPM is insuring obligations, Bear might not need to sell itself at all” is extremely overly optimistic and a bit naive. JPM for all intents and purposes is running Bear Sterns now. They are making all the financial and risk decisions for the firm. If the share holders vote down the deal JPM will remove its liquidity and go home. With no assets (its headquarters will already have a JPM banner across the lobby), no employees (the talented ones will already be at hedge funds), and only liabilities they still can’t fund, there is nothing left for the shareholders accept the gratification that they did not sell out to JPM.

    2. JP Says:

      dream on amateur

    3. blade Says:

      well put on the response. i couldnt said it any better myself.. amateur

    4. James Cullen Says:

      JP and Blade,
      Good thing you guys didn’t bother reading more than the title… Stephen clearly says BSC might never be priced at >$90/share, but that doesn’t mean that the value of the assets to JPM won’t be worth the equivalent billions of dollars.

    Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.