Jim Cramer Likes WWE: So What?
CA Editors
Terence Kennelly sends: This past Tuesday evening on his show Mad Money, Jim Cramer praised one of his favorite stocks, World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), by inviting CEO Linda McMahon on the show to talk about the growth of the company. Cramer, who professed that he had been following the stock for a long time, claimed that the recent dividend increase and earnings growth were signals to buy and that investors on Wall Street were “snobs” for not having invested in them earlier.
Well first things first Jim, you’ve been bullish on WWE since its first “lightening round” mention on a June 1st 2006 episode of Mad Money. Following that show it reached a record high near $19 a share, a level that was only surpassed three days ago after the interview with Linda McMahon. So what happened during the almost two year period where you re-iterated your bullish sentiment on WWE a total of 9 times?
Consider the following three-year chart:

To put it simply… nothing. Since its first mention on Mad Money two years ago, WWE has consistently achieved mediocre growth and met the low earnings expectations of Wall Street. Its share price has floundered between $14 and $18 despite its consistency and occasional beating of expectations. Why? Well if Jim Cramer’s memory was as good as his temper he would remember perhaps the greatest media flop of the 21st century, because I can assure you NBC Universal and its parent company General Electric (GE) haven’t forgotten about it. Do the words “XFL” bring back any memories?
It seems as though every time WWE has attempted growth in areas outside of its core activities it has failed. Starting with the XFL and most recently with WWE Films, it has failed to produce substantial growth in anything besides live events and merchandising. And Jim Cramer wonders why the stock has never taken off… being known for perhaps the worst sports experiment of all time (the XFL) and one of the worst movies of 2007 does indeed have an impact on investor sentiment, regardless of how high WWE’s dividend yield may be.
On the February 5th, 2007 episode of Mad Money, Jim Cramer was again asked about WWE, and whether he thought it really had growth potential. Here is his response: “Here’s the thing: WWE has done absolutely nothing since I recommended it, but you got a 6% yield. And you know what? … I am sticking by WWE, because of international business.” So Jim has stuck with WWE because of “international business” and now he is giving it a full “buy buy buy” recommendation. Even though WWE experienced strong international growth last quarter and overhauled its operations, what makes Jim’s buy recommendation any different than his last one?
Well… nothing. I guess you could go back to the old saying “Don’t count on anything and you won’t be disappointed” as a way to describe how Wall Street has felt about WWE. For years, Wall Street has had low expectations of WWE and for the most part, they have been justified. Every time the bar has been raised for WWE, it has failed to meet expectations. In 2001, NBC Universal had expectations of the XFL, but it faltered. In 2006 and 2007, investors had high expectations for the much anticipated WWE films division but so far it has been a bust. Now Jim is raising expectations for WWE again while hoping that it won’t fall short like it has in the past.
But should you like WWE? Yes, but only for its dividend yield and relative safety. As I’ve outlined in previous posts, it has issues that are constantly threatening to derail its growth and destroy its public image. (See World Wrestling Entertainment: Is the Worst Over?) Along with these issues, WWE’s growth has not been consistent enough to merit buying for anything other than its dividend. Although the annual “Wrestlemania bounce” in share price is imminent, given the current market climate, I’d wait to see what this stock does in the weeks and months following its “Mad Money” appearance before I make any moves.
And Cramer… please find some new reasons to love this stock because you’ve been saying the same thing for almost two years now.
Read more on World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).
See more Media, Terence Kennelly, WWE |

March 18th, 2008 at 11:20 pm
You should never base your investment decision solely on the safety of a generous dividend. There is no margin of safety in that.
March 19th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
Since you are weighing your investment decision/thesis heavily on the dividend of WWE, why not show us your margin of safety by calculating the intrinsic value of WWE using a simple dividend discount model? This way you could clearly illustrate your growth assumptions AND the MOS at the same time.
March 25th, 2008 at 8:51 pm
This is clearly a DDM valuation because it pays out all its earnings. You have to expect that most of your return will come from dividends and the shares will appriciat as the company raises its dividend. The core business is great, however, it is mature and you should not expect a lot of growth. I would not mind owning this at 7% yield.
June 9th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
The companys stock allways spikes 24 to 48 hours prior to paying the dividend which is being recorded this wed. What a great buy before han. You get the divident and higer price. Triple win.