AddThis Social Bookmark Button
  • Fast Cash -- Personal Payday Loans
  • Lower Trade Costs Nobody likes paying more than they have to. Now, through the use of contracts for difference trading, you can trade globally without the cumbersome monetary outlay required with traditional share buying.
  • Meta:

    Let’s Do Some Independent Thinking on Intel (INTC)

    March 4th, 2008 by James Cullen



    We’re down over 200 points on the Dow and 35 on the Nasdaq right now, and I’m reading headlines that are blaming Intel (INTC), down 2.5%, for part of that. I’m not buying it. The market does what the market does, and best just to draw inferences.

    On Intel’s conference call in mid-January, Intel CFO Stacy Smith said, “Our expectation for gross margin percentage in the first quarter is 56% plus or minus a couple of points.”

    Last evening, Intel issued a press release lowering but firming gross margin guidance to “54 percent, plus or minus a point.”

    I’m not holding Intel to the hard-and-fast rule that “a couple” equates to “two” - and I take the original guidance to mean slightly more than 2% in terms of wiggle room. If we were to represent gross margin guidance mathematically then, we have:

    Then: 56% ± 2.5% = 53.5% < X < 58.5%
    Now: 54% ± 1% = 53% < X < 55%

    If you read further into the Intel call, you’ll see what they were saying is that margins in this quarter are going to be weaker than on a quarter-over-quarter basis. In their last quarter, gross margin was 58.1%. When viewed this way, the guidance seems to be more accurately stated as 56%, with 2-3 points in potential downside…. which is basically what Intel actually said, albeit belatedly. Now we have:

    Then*: 56% - 2.5% = 53.5% < X < 56%
    Now: 54% ± 1% = 53% < X < 55%

    So why the downside move today? You could argue that it has to do with the removal of upside potential in gross margin, but I don’t think there was a realistic bet being placed on that in the first place that has to be priced out. I think this is more evidence that we haven’t quite turned the corner, economically speaking, and you should still have time to place your bets in the non-sexy tech sector.

    As I said back in February, we’re going to need to see evidence that we are at the bottom in terms of the economic cycle for there to be a broad-based rally in the Intels, Ciscos (CSCO), and Oracles (ORCL) of the market. IBM looks to be the outlier here, up about 10%, but I believe the broader pattern in tech still holds.

    Subscribe to our feed:

    AddThis Feed Button

    Intel Press Release

    INTC Q4 Conference Call

    More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Intel at Wikinvest

    See more CSCO, IBM, INTC, James Cullen, Large Caps, ORCL, Tech |

    2 Responses

    1. Bob Says:

      Good post. I agree we likely aren’t there yet for a sustained rally. But the way INTC came back today from that warning, and the mini NAS reversal, suggests maybe we’re close or at least nearing a counter trend rally.

    2. James Cullen Says:

      I saw the market reverse an hour or two after I wrote this - probably nothing more than an oversold bounce if you think about it.

    Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.