Will C-P-I Spell an End to the Fed Rate Cut Party?
Tom Lyons
While the Federal Reserve has been cutting key interest rates since late summer in an attempt to ease fears of a liquidity crisis (a stark contrast to “the world is awash in liquidity” sentiment heard so frequently earlier in 2007), some of the negative side-effects of the rate cuts have started to become evident. Mainly, a larger-than-expected jump in key areas of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). These areas include the cost of clothing, airline tickets and prescription drugs. The jump in pricing should not come as a huge surprise to anyone who has taken a basic macroeconomics course, nor to anyone who does the shopping for a household.
Inflation is a widely debated topic amongst economists and many do not agree whether inflation is detrimental to the economy or not. While many argue that money is neutral in the long run, most of us don’t live in the long run and prefer that our dollars remain a good store of value. One thing even economists generally agree on is that rapid inflation is very detrimental and is a clue that the economy has underlying problems. While “high inflation” typically has different meanings depending on where you live - and we aren’t anywhere near real hyperinflation - having CPI come in above a 5.5% compound annual rate certainly qualifies as high relative to what is expected. With this latest report showing a higher jump in prices, it brings into question how much room the Federal Reserve has with further rate cuts if they wish to keep inflation at a low rate.
Barry Ritholtz suggests that there will be no chance of a 50 basis point in rates unless the Fed panics. On the other hand, Jim Cramer suggested on CNBC that the Fed should cut rates even further because ultimately the dollar will respond to the fundamental strength of the economy, not short-term interest rates. While both present good arguments backing different viewpoints, the Fed cannot ignore inflation and as such they should not be overly aggressive in lowering interest rates. Cheap money started this housing mess, so how will it fix it?
With inflation likely to be rising as the Federal Reserve is forced to keep interest rates low, so realize that moderate inflation, while devaluing the purchasing power of your money, is not something that should seriously alter your investing strategy. Do analyze your portfolio and take into account what the current rate of inflation is, but in most cases the rate of inflation is mild enough not to force an investor to make any dramatic changes to their holdings.
So as we look forward, remember the very basic things that we learned in entry level economics classes - as interest rates are lowered, the inflation rate will rise. This will not impact most equity investments. Look at what events in the future will drive interest rate and inflation changes, and adjust accordingly. Personally, I am looking closely at how the Fed will balance credit problems against the need to keep inflation low, while also monitoring the yield curve. Of note there, long-term rates have held steady while short-term rates have come down greatly; the net result is a 50% increase in the 3-month/10-year Treasury spread in the last month, which could certainly help the money center banks make something back on deposits to offset losses related to writedowns.
See more Uncategorized |

December 15th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
The basic economics course you speak of also tells you that fed cuts take 6 to 12 months to be felt by the economy. I cannot agree that the current cuts are the cause for this inflation. The cause for this inflation has been the 5 year run up in commodity costs that were caused by low interest rates in 2002 to 2004 as well as strong infrastructure demand from emerging markets such as India, China, South America and the Middle East. These commodity prices have finally leaked into the broader economy. Right now house prices continue to fall. If they continue to fall the deflationary pressures caused by the negative wealth effect of falling home prices would be way worse that lower interest rates with mild inflation.
December 16th, 2007 at 12:10 am
Andrew,
While I agree that the rise in commodity prices over the past 5 years has contributed to the higher inflation rate we will have to agree to disagree on whether the drop in interest rates has contributed to a rise in inflation rates.
December 16th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Following up on that, I think it is a bit of a cop-out to simply attribute inflation to rising commodity prices being (finally) passed on to consumers. From 2004-2006 you had soaring prices for energy and metals, but inflation was supposedly in check. In 2007 you’ve seen food prices ratchet up significantly as well - not that core CPI notices that - but why only now do the statistics show inflation?
I realize the causes of inflation are extremely complex and thus I don’t like to dwell on something that is both difficult to understand and largely irrelevant (official stats running 3% vs. 5% isn’t that important for people like myself), but my tentative assumption when inflation starts rising three months after the Fed pumps money into the system, is that the Fed has something to do with it…
December 16th, 2007 at 9:27 pm
[...] Price Index showing that inflation is on the rise. I recently wrote an article about it on College Analysts about inflation and the effects that investors may see. Given this unexpected jump it is important [...]
December 17th, 2007 at 2:30 am
I’m going to have to agree with Andrew: I’m just finishing up macroeconomics and it is widely believed that any changes in monetary policy take 6+ months to take effect.
The weakening dollar is basically inflation on a worldwide scale: the pasta in rome you spent $10 on five years ago is $15 (or more) in dollars, today.
The rate cuts will certainly create a pro-inflationary environment in the next year, and the fed should start thinking about if they want to try to counter that problem.