» Blog Archive » Don’t Fight the Fed: Why Fundamentals Now Matter Less Than You Think


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Archives:

Meta:

Don’t Fight the Fed: Why Fundamentals Now Matter Less Than You Think

September 30th, 2007 by Tom Lyons

With the latest economic data being mixed, coupled with a falling dollar and new housing sales dropping to the lowest they have been in seven years the fundamental aspects of the economy are somewhat unsettling. While not everything is bad in the economy - jobless claims fell by 15,000 bringing the total number of jobless claims in 298,000 in the month of September and official inflation statistics show a low reading - Wall Street has overlooked most of the negative data and been extremely optimistic since the Federal Reserve decided a rate cut was necessary to ease the nation’s credit problems. With this myopic focus on the Federal Reserve’s willingness to cut rates in order spur the economy, I do not see the stock market making any major declines in the coming months even if further deteriorating in the economy hits, as poor data will likely draw another rate cut-relief rally.

If the Federal Reserve continues to cut rates, what will be the probable impact of that course of action? The strength of a country’s currency is heavily impacted by interest rate policies. When interest rates are lowered in an attempt to relieve pressure and spur the economy, the currency typically weakens relative to others as investors will transfer funds out of countries with low interest rates and deposit the funds in countries with higher interest rates in order to receive a better return on fixed-income investments. While the classic economics model says that lower rates translate to stronger growth and higher rates slow inflation, the high interdependence of economies today should call that logic into question. As a country’s currency falls the people in that nation lose buying power because foreign goods effectively cost more. This is one of the main causes of inflation. The Federal Reserve can raise interest rates to strengthen the dollar and slow inflation, but with the Federal Reserve’s current policy to lower rates we are stuck between a rock and a hard place between keeping funding available and trying to prevent inflation.

On the other hand, it may not be such a hard place for the Federal Reserve to be in if they are willing to debase the dollar in an attempt to prop up the market until the 2008 elections. Between that and the Beijing Olympics, both United States and Chinese government officials have massive vested interests in keeping their respective economic wheels greased, and part of this might involve propping up the other country’s economy as long as they can. In order to prove that China is truly a major economic power the Chinese government needs their economy to be in the midst of economic boom during the coming Olympic Games. This, coupled with the political importance of having the US economy continuing an upward swing going into the Presidential Election, leaves little chance of the Federal Reserve and the Chinese officials letting a major market downturn take place in the coming months.

Overall, I believe the information that comes out daily with regards to the market makes it is easy to see fundamental reasons why the markets should experience a correction in the coming months. Unfortunately, I believe that the overwhelming sentiment right now is that as long as the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates low then equities are still cheap and are better investments when compared to fixed income investments. Until the end of 2008, I feel that the Federal Reserve will be forced into further devaluing the dollar by keeping interest rates low in order to give the people what they want - cheap debt - and that bodes poorly for whoever is left holding cleanup responsibilities in 2009 and beyond.

Subscribe to our feed:

AddThis Feed Button

See more Uncategorized |

7 Responses

  1. David DeCola Says:

    “the Chinese government needs their economy to be in the midst of economic boom during the coming Olympic Games. This, coupled with the political importance of having the US economy continuing an upward swing going into the Presidential Election, leaves little chance of the Federal Reserve and the Chinese officials letting a major market downturn take place in the coming months.”

    If only governments had this kind of ability to control markets, there would be no such thing as market downturns. Your theory displays the kind of wishful thinking and complacency associated with market tops.

  2. Tom Lyons Says:

    Goverments have a great impact over the short-term markets. The problem is when the market hits a point where the natural correction has to happen. I do not feel the market is at that point yet.

  3. Rob Siv Says:

    I hope we’re reaching a market top, because nearly my entire watchlist has been hitting new highs, and unfortunately I don’t own most of them (I did a lot of selling last week). So, I’m hoping for a nice October scare to make these stocks pull back. The easiest way to play what Tom is talking about is through weak dollars plays. One such stock I like (and own) is RSTI. But, if you look at a chart of RSTI, it’s just like the charts of most small-cap weak dollar plays–straight up. The weak dollar trade has worked for so long now that you have to wonder what is going to provide the fuel for these stocks to keep making new highs.

  4. James Cullen Says:

    One weak dollar/expansionary economics play I still like is Freeport McMoRan (FCX), the world’s largest publicly traded copper miner. Freeport also has significant gold reserves, and could easily go to $130+…

  5. Andrew Maro Says:

    Just recently found this site James. I think your insites are pretty accurate especially with Freeport. I’ve had more than three people advising me to invest in the copper company, and so far is going well. In terms of our economy, I think that the huge setback in the financial sector will eventually pick itself back up, it may take a few more months before it can correct itself.

  6. Mike Says:

    I own FCX as well as TRE, we have started the next leg in Gold and Copper for sure…Gold shorts have been wrong for years and with the recent actions of the Fed, will continue to be…too bad our currency doesn’t buy much anymore

  7. Long-term investment Says:

    I did a study of Fed rat cuts of 200bp and more and the subsequent 1 year/3 year returns of the S&P 500 index and a small cap value index. The study indicates, for long-term investors, it is better not to fight the Fed.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.