» Blog Archive » Why You Can’t Ignore Harley-Davidson After This Gap-Down


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Archives:

Meta:

Why You Can’t Ignore Harley-Davidson After This Gap-Down

September 7th, 2007 by James Cullen

Bad news is out at Harley-Davidson (HOG), and shares are down 9.2% to a 15-month low as I write this. The motorcycle maker cut guidance and said it would be reducing unit shipments in the near future after soft sales over the summer.

Is Harley-Davidson really worth 9% less today compared to yesterday because next year’s earnings are being placed at 9% less than estimates? Given the strong brand behind the company, I would say that should certainly not be the case. As part of its 2007 Global Brands study, BusinessWeek ranked the Harley-Davidson brand name as the 45th most valuable in the world, being worth $7.7 billion. Combining that with the net tangible assets the company is holding of $2.6 billion gives you a value of $10.3 billion; HOG’s current market cap is just a 24% premium to that figure. With Harley’s average annual free cash flow over the last three years clocking in close to $700 million, the company is exceptionally profitable too.

Why is the market knocking a good company like Harley down? I suspect this is a case of a company providing too much information on a bad day. The jobs report coming in very weak would likely have led to HOG getting hit to some degree, but now that Harley has put their problems in the context of a poor economy and lack of consumer strength, they’ve added that stigmatism to the stock. As Jim Cramer said just before his famous rate-cut rant, executives need to adopt the Henry Ford model: “Never explain, never complain.” If Jim Ziemer (Harley’s CEO) simply came out and said something along the lines of “we’re seeing some slowness in sales, but we’re doing fine and will continue to do so” how severely would the reaction have been? I’d guess something less than what we’ve seen, but lets play the hand we’re dealt.

This set-up with HOG looks like a gift. Not a perfect gift, mind you, but something you should take a long, hard look at and consider getting long. If you look at the ten-year numbers for Harley, you can easily see how phenomenally successful the company has been during that period. The average ROE for that period was 27.9% and improving; over the last five years the average ROE is 30.7%. Gross and operating margins have held steady or increased year-over-year without fail, and although that trend seems likely to end this year, investors are still looking at a company with exceptional pricing power and a track record of making solid marginal improvements that increase profitability. Harley has weathered economic weakness before (between 2000 and 2004, EPS shot up from $1.13 to $3.00) and I imagine this time will be no different. Harley has a great lineup, and sources have told me a huge order backlog exists for top-end Harley models. I think long-term investors will be rewarded if they take advantage of this opportunity to scoop up a great and profitable brand when others are being short-sighted and fearful.

For the valuation, I’ll approach it using the philosophy of buying the business for current net worth plus the sum of discounted future cash flows. Current analyst estimates call for growth over the next five years to run around 11.5%, although I’m anticipating those are going to be slashed in a wave of downgrades. Conservatively cutting that number by about half to 6%, discounting those estimates at 9%, applying a slightly-below-average 15x exit multiple to those cash flow estimates, and adding in the net tangible assets gives a per-share value for HOG of $54.60, or approximately 11.3% above the current trading price. I believe that valuation, however, overlooks the enormous value in the intangible asset that is the Harley brand name. So, a simple solution: for each $1 billion you think the Harley name is worth, add $3.88 to the share price. Using the $7.7 billion figure given by BusinessWeek adds another $29.90 per share in value for a total price near $84.50 - that represents a 72% premium to current trading prices. You can slice the valuation however you’d like, the inevitable conclusion seems to be that HOG is cheap right now. A chance to buy a company as profitable as Harley at such a cheap valuation doesn’t come around often, and perhaps I’ve understated this, but you also might be getting a piece of the brand with the most fanatically loyal customers ever in the bargain. Look at the BusinessWeek list and ask yourself what other brand there has customers tattooing the name onto their skin. Macaholics don’t even do that. You think someone with a Harley tattoo on their bicep is going to be seen riding a Suzuki? I don’t think so either. HOG under $50 is your buy.

Subscribe to our feed:

AddThis Feed Button

More on this topic (What's this?)
Harley Davidson Takes A Spill
Harley Davidson: "Below MSRP" Was A Bad Harbinger
Read more on Harley-Davidson at Wikinvest

See more Autos, HOG, Industrials, James Cullen, Large Caps |

7 Responses

  1. Anonymous Says:

    Good comments.
    However, on your intrinsic value estimate, if you I understand your logic correctly, you are valuing hog by adding together:
    (1) the present value of free cash flows from continuing operations
    (2) Exit free cash flow
    (3) Net tangible assets
    (4) Brand equity
    I have at least once in the past contemplated with the idea of adding intangibles to my intrinsic value target but I ended up killing the idea for the simple rationale that the levels of both (1) and (2) are positively correlated to the level of (4). Thus, it does not make much sense to double count the value of brand equity even though it is as real and powerful as any other asset out there. The only scenario under which I would consider adding intangibles to my calculation is when there is a high likelihood that it could be liquidated in the near future.

  2. James Cullen Says:

    Anon,
    I too contemplated the problem of counting intangibles in valuation, as well as the “double counting” problem. That’s why I offered both the hard asset valuation that excludes intangibles, as well as an easy way to account for personal preferences in valuing the brand.
    If I had to include intangibles for HOG, my natural inclination would be to discount the estimated brand value by some amount - perhaps 50% - and go from there.

  3. Josh Says:

    My perception is that Harley Davidson has enjoyed something of a fad over the last decade (a period where EBIT margins went from 14 to 26%) due to baby boomer’s going through their 50’s mid-life crisis. Was it not popular for slightly over-weight suburbanite men just beginning the greying years to purchase a Harley as a semi-toy, similar to a boat? Perhaps these men owned harley’s in the 1960s and now that the kids are in college, they can re-live their youth with their wives. These purchases strike me as faddish and a source of inflated earnings. These purchases would would have been for luxury versions of the bikes (higher margin) and extremely price insensitive. What are your thoughts on this perspective?

  4. David Says:

    re: josh, you’re 100% right in that the demographics have greatly benefited HOG. That said, they have managed to diversify their customer base with 10% of sales now going to women (up from basically none a decade ago). The stock is currently trading at a five year p/e of less than 15 (if you use the average earnings for the past five years and divide by current shares outstanding). Even despite the trends you mentioned, international growth has been extremely strong, motorcycling is a lifestyle and people are going to continue doing it, and at this price you can have continued year over year low-mid single digit domestic volume declines indefinably and as long as international holds up the way it has you’ll be fine as an investor. Now imagine if domestic stays flat over the next five years (they sell the same number of bikes in ‘11 as they did in ‘06) and international keeps growing and double’s, that would imply that earnings (including inflation benefits) would likely be in the 1.6 billion dollar range five years from now, if you assume that the company uses all free cash flow after dividents you can see the share count coming down to 200 million from ~250 now and eps of $8, slap a more normal (as in the markets aren’t panicked and people are tired of shorting hog and decide to focus all their attention and shorting jnj since obviously nobody will be using band aids or baby wipes in the future) p/e of 17.5 give you a $140 stock in five years + 2 % a year for dividends for a total return in the low 20% a year range,

  5. Gunnlaugur Briem Says:

    “… what other brand there has customers tattooing the name onto their skin”

    Well …

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Charles_petzold.png

    To be fair, Petzold is not so much a customer as he is a core employee. But that still is a brand tattoo!

  6. dutch Says:

    adding the brand is a double count. but the DCF looks reasonable, if not conservative.

  7. » Blog Archive » A Dozen $10 Billion+ Buys Says:

    [...] 2. Harley Davidson (HOG) - $11.9B It has been almost a month since Harley acknowledged something many people already knew: dealer inventories were high, and something had to give. The reduced guidance has left the stock at a 2-year low. HOG is undervalued. [...]

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.